In the case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank, regarding the <em><u>class action </u></em><em><u>lawsuit </u></em>settlement reached by the parties involved, we can confirm the settlement payment is that of 5.2 million dollars.
The case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank was a <u>class action </u><u>lawsuit</u>. A class-action suit is one in which the lawsuit is a collection of suits filed by <u>many parties, which are tried as a single case, and the parties in question are represented by </u><u>one member </u><u>or group of </u><u>members</u>.
In the case mentioned the lawsuit resulted in a settlement. This is when the party being sued <u>agrees to a payout in return for the charges being dropped. </u>It is said that the Bank in question created a settlement fund to pay the members involved, which held a total of 5.2 million dollars to be paid to the victims.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/16108643?referrer=searchResults
Answer: your question about the answer to the question is confusing to me
Explanation: I don’t know how to do it
The use of information to falsely accuse a company such as it occurred when XYZ ran a story that was not related to the restaurant they wanted to accuse is an example of False light (option D)
The false light is:
- A grievance of the laws of the United States that refers to defamation.
- They include a person's right to protection against false publicity to the public.
- This right must be in balance with freedom of expression
According to the above, in the situation, the cable channel XYZ incurred false light because they showed a video of a restaurant chain different from the restaurant chain in which there was an outbreak of E. coli.
Therefore, the chain of restaurants in the video would be affected by defamation because it did not correspond to the case of the E. coli outbreak. So the correct answer is D. False light.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/8512832
Answer:
It is open!
Explanation:
according to its twitter, its open. Hours: Mon, Wed, Thur, Sat, Sun 12:00-7:00PM
Answer:
It would be E because they need probable cause to search the house.
Explanation:
B would not be correct because to pass the security check you must be searched.
C would be incorrect because officers can Search/Pat anyone down that they have stopped without probable cause.
D is not correct as the owner gives consent
A is incorrect because School Administrators only need reasonable suspicion.
