1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
3 years ago
9

Fresher Foods, Inc., orally agreed to purchase one thousand bushels of corn for $1.25 per bushel from Dale Vernon, a farmer. Fre

sher Foods paid $125 down and agreed to pay the remainder of the purchase price on delivery, which was scheduled for one week later. When Fresher Foods tendered the balance of $1,125 on the scheduled day of delivery and requested the corn, Vernon refused to deliver it. Fresher Foods sued Vernon for damages, claiming that Vernon had breached their oral contract.
Can Fresher Foods recover? If so, to what extent?
Business
1 answer:
Yuri [45]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

In the case of Fresher Goods, Inc.v. Vernon, the trial court will possibly conclude that Vernon must complete the portion of the payment which has already been compensated for as a result of partial results.

Explanation:

Vernon accepted partial payment for the sold goods. While the Law of Frauds demanded that any contract for the selling of goods at a price of $500 or more be enforceable in writing, the oral arrangement was partially compensated and agreed by all parties. That part of the deal was binding, so Vernon would supply 100 corn bushels to Fresher for $1.25 per bushel.

You might be interested in
Using the following information: 12/31/17 Accounts receivable $526000 Allowance (35700 ) Cash realizable value $490300 During 20
yawa3891 [41]

Answer:

The change in the cash realizable value from the balance 12/31/17 to 12/31/18 was $37,840 increase.

Explanation:

Cash realizable value of accounts receivable is simply the amount that is deemed recoverable after factoring the portion that is uncollectible.

The effects of the transactions during the year are as follows:

Sales on account:

Debit Accounts receivable                            $145,400

Credit Sales revenue                                     $145,400

<em>(To recognize the sales on account)</em>

Collections on account:

Debit Cash                                                      $100,000

Credit Accounts receivable                           $100,000

<em>(To recognize collections on account)</em>

Write-off:

Debit Allowance for doubtful accounts            $3,960

Credit Accounts receivable                               $3,960

<em>(To recognize write-off of outstanding accounts receivable)</em>

Therefore, the effects of the foregoing journals on Accounts receivable are: $526,000 + $145,400 - $100,000 - $3,960 = $567,440.

As at 12/31/18, cash realizable value would be $567,440 - $39,300 = $528,140. The change in the cash realizable value from the balance at 12/31/17 to 12/31/18 was therefore $528,140 - $490,300 = $37,840 (increase).

7 0
3 years ago
A(n) _____ is central to individuals and organizations of all sizes and ensures that information can be shared across all busine
Ann [662]

An enterprise system is central to individuals and organizations of all sizes and ensures that information can be shared across all business functions and all levels of management to support the running and managing of a business. And large-scale application software packages that support business processes, information flows, reporting, and data analytics in complex organizations.


3 0
3 years ago
A proposed new project has projected sales of $132,000, costs of $66,000, and depreciation of $13,500. The tax rate is 30%. Calc
Verizon [17]

Answer:Operating cash flow $ _50,250__

Yes, the answer is same in each case

Explanation:

a)   EBIT + Depreciation - Tax

= ($132,000-$66,000-$13,500) + $13,500 - Tax

= $52,500 + $13,500-(30% x $52,500)

=$52,500 + $13,500-15,750

EBIT + Depreciation - Tax=$50,250

b)Top down OCF = EBIT - (EBIT x Tax) + Depreciation  

Top down OCF = $52,500  - ($52,500 x 30%) +  $13,500  

Top down OCF = $52,500 -15,750 + $13,500

Top down OCF =$50,250

Tax shield OCF =(Sales - Cost)(1-t) + Depreciation (t)

Tax shield OCF = ($132,000-$66,000) (1-0.30) + ($13,500 x0.30)  

Tax shield OCF =$66,000 x 0.7 + 4,050

Tax shield OCF = 46,200+ 4,050

Tax shield OCF = $50,250

Bottom Up OCF = Net Income + Dep

Bottom Up OCF =($132,000-$66,000-$13,500 ) - Tax ) + Dep

Bottom Up OCF = $52,500-(0.3 x $52,500 )+ $13,500

Bottom Up OCF = $52,500 -15,750 + $13,500

Bottom Up OCF =$50,250

2. Yes, the answer is same in each case

4 0
3 years ago
Jurisdiction E spends approximately $7 million each winter on snow removal. The jurisdiction is considering adding a new income
frez [133]

Answer:

'Taxes' can be defined as a compulsory contribution to the state's or country's revenues, which are levied by the governments on personal incomes of individuals or profits of the corporate, or on some transactions.

Taxes are the main source of revenues for any government, through which it receives the necessary funds to spend on various activities it undertakes for public welfare and maintaining the law and order and security of the nation.

Many theorists believe that every tax should be evaluated on certain standards and the following four standards have been mentioned for evaluating whether taxes are good or not:

  1. Taxes should be sufficient to fulfill the government's requirements
  2. Taxes should be convenient for the government to implement and for the citizens to pay
  3. Taxes should be efficient economically
  4. Taxes should be fair

There may be certain provisions introduced in the federal tax system, which are targeted to induce certain behaviors or shift people's attention towards certain activities. These provisions are called tax preferences

Does this proposed change in Jurisdiction E's tax law meet the definition of a tax preference? Explain briefly.

In the given question, the decision of the jurisdiction to give deduction to the people for the snow removal equipment they purchase, is definitely a tax preference as it induces people to invest in snow removing machines, as they are getting full deduction of such expense in income taxes.

By having this provision, the government is motivating people to invest in these machines, and people also have the benefit of having such machine with them, and also getting tax deduction for such expense, so getting such machine almost free (this applies to people who have incomes in such tax bracket only). Thus it is the way of government in encouraging people to buy snow removing machines and reduce the burden on the government. Thus it is clearly a tax preference.

Jurisdiction E forecasts that the proposed change will decrease its annual tax revenues by $250,000 but will improve the jurisdiction's financial condition by $300,000. On what assumptions is this forecast based?

The forecast regarding decrease in annual tax and improvement in financial condition is based on the assumptions of people taking benefit of such a provision, and actually investing in snow removing machines.

The jurisdiction believes that people will purchase the machines and make claims for deductions, effecting the tax revenue by $250,000. But at the same time, as many people will themselves remove the snow, the government doesn't have to spend so much on snow removal and thus make the savings of $300,000

6 0
3 years ago
The perfectly competitive firm's short-run supply curve is the Group of answer choices upward-sloping portion of its average tot
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

Portion of its marginal cost curve that lies above its average variable cost curve.

Explanation:

This is explained to be the portion of its marginal cost curve because marginal gross benefits exceeds marginal cost, the firm can earn greater profits by increasing its output.

These profits are been maximized by choosing to supply the level of output where its marginal revenue equals its marginal cost. When this revenue is below the said marginal cost, money is lost, and consequently, it must reduce its output. Profits are however utilized when the firm chooses the level of output where its marginal revenue equals its marginal cost.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Business K exchanged an old asset (FMV $95,000) for a new asset (FMV $95,000). Business K’s tax basis in the old asset was $107,
    11·1 answer
  • Leisha grew 4.5 inches and gained 3 pounds last year. about how many years old is leisha likely to be?
    12·1 answer
  • The U.S. corporation Fun Toys, Inc. sets up a firm in China. The parent company remains in the United States and retains complet
    13·1 answer
  • Consider a $10,000 machine that will reduce pretax operating costs by $3,000 per year over a 5-year period. Assume no changes in
    5·1 answer
  • A promissory note
    8·1 answer
  • The decision-making themes covered in Business Analytics: Data Analysis &amp; Decision Making include which of the following?
    9·1 answer
  • 24. Armin is trying to decide whether to buy a season pass to his college basketball team’s 20 home games this season. The cost
    6·1 answer
  • Rice Dazzle Inc. has been making the same breakfast cereal for 50 years. Recently, sales have plummeted. To counteract this, the
    5·1 answer
  • A firm presents a market value balance sheet and a book value balance sheet to prospective investors. What is wrong with using t
    5·1 answer
  • Describe What You Will Use The Money For?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!