Answer:
U-Boat (Unterseeboot)
Explanation:
During World War I, German Submarines played an essential role in the North Sea and the war. Germans were quite advanced when it came to controlling submarines. During the first World War, commander Franz Becker guided German submarines which we know today as U-boats. The Germans unrestricted submarine warfare tactics caused great offence to the merchant vessels in the waters around Great Britain particularly of the Royal Navy and America.
The most likely reason that the Confederate army burned Richmond was "<span>c. to make sure Union soldiers could not use Confederate resources," since it was clear that Richmond offered a great number of such resources for the taking. </span>
Answer:
D) Each solar system contains billions of galaxies
Think, there are no other galaxies from the sun to Pluto (not a planet but still in our solar system) and the answer said EACH solar system and, a Galaxy contains solar systems not the other way around.
<u>Difference between geographic expansion in New England and in the Chesapeake region:</u>
<u>New England:</u>
- New Englanders as a result of rough soil had constrained cultivating so they needed to go to timber, hide, and angling.
-
Homesteaders in the New England settlements suffered harshly cool winters and mellow summers.
-
The land was level near the coastline yet turned out to be bumpy and rugged more remote inland.
-
The dirt was commonly rough, making cultivating troublesome.
<u>
Chesapeake region:</u>
- The Chesapeake district was, be that as it may, extremely wealthy in soil, and cultivating turned into the primary concern.
- Tobacco, indigo, and rice were the central yields.
-
Religion in the Chesapeake district was not in any manner normal, with the exception of in a couple of zones.
-
The reaction expresses that pioneers in the Chesapeake were increasingly "socialized" with the Indians.
- The province of Maryland was expected as an asylum for Catholics in the wake of being abused when the Catholic Church isolated from the Church of England.
Answer:
Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.
Explanation:
- Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
- The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
- The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
- I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.
