Answer:
Though President Wilson firmly believed in an international body to conduct the matters of conflict between different nations by peace talks and his 'Fourteen Points' were influential in the foundation of the League of Nations, he could not rally the United States to be a member of League of Nations. Opposition came from the isolationist section who considers that Article Ten could draw the United States again into international war. Article ten required the members of the League to defend an attack on any of its member from any external threat.
<span>President Roosevelt's key environmental preservation measures were not strictly tied to programs and laws. Its fundamental role was in the field of land protection and expansion of federal reserves.
Hugs!</span>
Answer:
Let us assume that Jimmy Carter is an intelligent, decent, hardworking man. Assume, moreover, that he has appointed to his cabinet and sub-cabinet many men and women who are experienced and dedicated. How, then, can a president—certainly no less mentally alert than most past presidents—with many advisers of high caliber, produce such an undistinguished presidency?
It’s a puzzlement. And it cannot be accounted for by most of the explanations currently in vogue, such as: Carter’s an outsider who really doesn’t understand the levers of national governance; or Carter surrounds himself with a “Georgia Mafia” whose weaknesses are the same as his own; or Carter is a bad manager who hasn’t been able to sort out decisions that a president must make from those that should be settled at lower levels; or Congress is so uncontrollable that it will not allow any president to exercise the reins of leadership; or the bureaucracy has grown beyond the span of presidential control; or many of the nation’s problem’s are highly intractable; or even all these reasons taken together—although there is truth in all.
I would like to put forward another theory: The root of the problem is that Jimmy Carter is the first Process President in American history.
“Process President”—using a definition by Aaron Wildavsky and Jack Knott—means that Carter places “greater emphasis on methods, procedures and instruments for making policy than on the content of policy itself.”
Carter is an activist. He wants to do things. Yet his campaign statements should have warned us that save for the human rights thrust in foreign policy, his passion in government is for how things are done, rather than what should be done.
He believes that if the process is good the product will be good. In other words, if he sets up a procedure for making policy that is open, comprehensive (his favorite word), and involves good people, whatever comes out of this pipeline will be acceptable (within certain budgetary limits).
Explanation:
Answer:
what is the question?
Explanation:
*$&%<$&'jdbdbfusjznxjjzndnsidnxnx
Answer: Confucianism in all probability is that the biggest influence in education of China throughout the complete Chinese history. Later in Han, a style of public education system was established.
Explanation:
