Hey there!
The ancient Greeks used direct democracy, and we use representative. The difference is that first of all, with a direct democracy, the opinions of the people directly affect the outcome of the decision being made. Those eligible to vote voted in assemblies, and the response of the majority ruled.
Here- it's a bit different. We use representative democracy- meaning that we elect representatives to vote and speak for us on the behalf of the people.
There's our difference right there. A direct democracy - like I said is where decisions directly affect outcomes, as opposed to where representatives are elected on behalf of the people to make laws and represent their voters and territory.
Your answer is C.
Hope this helps!
One effect of the Boston Massacre was that "John Adams was criticized for defending the British soldiers who were involved," since he felted that they deserved fair representation.
After world war ii, the communist party led by gradually succeeded in gaining majority support with Mao Zedong.
<h3>Who is Mao Zedong?</h3>
Mao Zedong can be described as Chinese leader, which facilitated the rule of communism in China.
Therefore, communist party led by gradually succeeded in gaining majority support with Mao Zedong.
Learn more about Mao Zedong at;
brainly.com/question/11526642
One important advantage that primary soruces have over secondary sources is that primary sources offer a firsthand account of an event - b, which isn't the case with secondary sources. Although this leaves primary sources prone to being biased compared to secondary sources.
Answer:
The correct answer is A.
Explanation:
This sentence is correctly punctuated because it separates the initial adverbial clause with a comma, and then puts another comma before the conjuncting adverb "while," which is correctly used joining two sentences.
