Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
The "Third World" was defined as the unaligned countries that the US and the Soviet Union were trying to bring into the fold, and thus became a political battleground. I Hope I could help! :)
Have a wonderful rest of the day.
A) an eagle is the correct answer.
What decision are you talking about?
