Answer:
pre-bonus income is $33600
Explanation:
given data
bonus = 20% of net income
income before the bonus = $57600
to find out
pre-bonus income
solution
we know pre income bonus is express as
pre-bonus income = bonous + share of income ............1
so bonus = 20/120 × 57600 = $9600
and share of net income = 1/2 × ( 57600 - 9600)
share of net income = $24000
so from equation 1
pre-bonus income = bonous + share of income
pre-bonus income =9600+ 24000
pre-bonus income is $33600
Answer:
<em>Credit Unions</em><em> </em>is known as a cooperative association.
hope it helps!
That’s like the quarantine lol but just a bit higher
Answer:
$100,000
Explanation:
Depreciable cost refers to the portion of an asset's costs that will be spread throughout the use-life of the asset. It is the amount to depreciated over the gainful life of the asset.
Depreciable cost is calculated by subtracting salvage value from the original cost of the asset. Salvage value is also the scrap value.
Depreciable cost = asset cost - salvage value
Depreciable cost= $120,000 - $20,000
Depreciable cost =$100,000
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
