Answer:
Reactive devaluation
Explanation:
From the scenario described. It can be observed that the students gave the idea a lower rating because it was coming from the opposing side. Hence, this is am an example of REACTIVE DEVALUATION.
This is because Reactive Devaluation is a term that describes a form of mental bias from one party towards another. This arises when a plan is devalued by party A because the plan comes from party B who is perceived as the opponent.
Hence, in this case, the students' reaction is an example of Reaction Devaluation
Answer:
The purpose of the Freedmen’s Bureau was "c. to provide relief to all poor people in the South."
Answer&Explanation:
This principle refers to those action which are legally permitted but are also likely to result to severe impact which wasn't initially intended like the death of a person as a side effect of the good action that was actual intended.
For example a doctor may give a patient some pills to relieve stress symptoms eventhough the doctor knows that this may have side effect such as actual shortening their life.
The doctor's intention are not to kill the patient but the death would be a side effect of the good results which are to reduce the patient's pain.
Another example is in the warfare where soldiers may go on a mission that requires that what ever action they take few civilian may get hurt in the process but the intention isn't to kill those civilian but it is a side effects of the good operation of eliminating the legitimate target which may be a threat to a country.
Answer:
The contract is voidable at Race's discretion.
Explanation:
The law will recognise the contract as being valid. However, the inebriated state in which Race was in when he signed the contract is of concern here. Since his ability to fully understand and comprehend the terms and nature of the contract was compromised, he has the option to disaffirm or reaffirm the contract in question.
