Answer: They wanted each other's land
Explanation: The conflict between ranchers and farmers basically comes down to either of the two not wanting each other on their land. Ranchers wanted to keep their often big amounts of land for grazing and driving cattle, and farmers wanted to settle down on the rancher's land and farm. People and animals moving west.
I don't know what the "followings" are, but I can tell you that Tenement buildings had no interest in caring for the people who lived there. Tenement housing had its people share bathrooms, there were no lights(besides the window), and the rooms were small and cramped.
I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
To be eligible to serve, you must be at least 25 years old, been a U.S citizen for the past seven years, and be an inhabitant of the state they represent (at election time).
The treaty of paris of 1763 gave control of Canada to the British colonies.
