Answer:
Inheritance
Explanation:
The above question highlights example of inheritance. Whenever the ownership of business is transferred from one generation to another, it can be taken as an example of inheritance in a capitalist system.
The same has happened in the above question as well. Chet Bowes who owned his own lanscapped business has now transferred the ownership to his son Josh who has recently taken charge, now it is very much clear from the question neither Josh built the company on his own now was hired on the basis of his capabilities, the transfer happened on the basis of his relationship with the owner of the company. The question shows an example of inheritance.
Answer:
$54,078.85
Explanation:
This is a Time Value of Money question, We are required to find the Payment (Pmt) from the following given parameters :
Pv = $250,000
i = 8%
n = 6
P/yr = 1
Fv = $ 0
Pmt = ?
Pmt = <em>$54,078.85</em>
Therefore Payment per year is <em>$54,078.85</em> (using a financial calculator)
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
B. procure-to-pay cycle.
Explanation:
Procure to pay -
It is the method of purchasing , requisitioning , accounting or paying for any services or goods .
It is the set of activities , which are needed firstly , to detect the need , to assign the supplier , approve it , acknowledge the receipt and at last payment to the supplier .
Hence , the correct term for the given statement is B. procure-to-pay cycle .
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
