Answer:
Crucial or important?
Explanation:
Tell me if there's anything else to the question but I would say that it is very important to convince a person with understanding or appeal.
Answer:
A. He has made several significant contributions to the areas of organizational learning and change.
Explanation:
<em>Option B</em>: Peter Drucker was the first person to discuss MBO, not Peter Senge. So, this option is incorrect.
<em>Option C</em>: It is the function of management. Therefore, Peter Senge might contribute to this one, but there is no evidence. So, it is wrong.
<em>Option D</em>: Peter Senge advocated the scientific methods of management, but not for the determination of efficient production.
<em>Option E</em>: He does not contend with the bureaucratic structure. Therefore, it is wrong, either.
<em>Option A</em>: It is the answer because he has made several contributions to the areas of organizational learning through the establishment of the society of organizational learning.
Answer:
These statements are correct:
- It makes it easier to compare prices across Europe - the Euro is the common curriency across 19 countries, but prices in those countries are far from being the same. For example, Germany is a lot more expensive than Greece (although a lot wealthier too), and Greek people can easily find out that the same product in Germany costs more euros than in Greece.
- It makes Europe an optimal currency area - in the Eurozone, economic efficiency is now higher because resources can be allocated across different countries thanks to the fact that prices can be compared in the region.
Answer:
b. enforce the policy or recover the amount of the premiums paid.
Explanation:
Petra being a a member of the class of persons protected by the statute is a big advantage. This translates to lesser or no punishments at all for defaulting the set rules and protocols of insurance in his/her state.
This means Petra can either enforce the law as a top person or recover the amount of premiums paid.
Answer:
The correct answer is lower.
Explanation:
The theory of rational expectations is a hypothesis of economic science that states that predictions about the future value of economically relevant variables made by agents are not systematically wrong and that errors are random (white noise). An alternative formulation is that rational expectations are "consistent expectations around a model," that is, in a model, agents assume that the predictions of the model are valid. The rational expectations hypothesis is used in many contemporary macroeconomic models, in game theory and in applications of rational choice theory.
Since most current macroeconomic models study decisions over several periods, the expectations of workers, consumers and companies about future economic conditions are an essential part of the model. There has been much discussion about how to model these expectations and the macroeconomic predictions of a model may differ depending on the assumptions about the expectations (see the web's theorem). To assume rational expectations is to assume that the expectations of economic agents can be individually wrong, but correct on average. In other words, although the future is not totally predictable, it is assumed that the agents' expectations are not systematically biased and that they use all the relevant information to form their expectations on economic variables.
