The statement regarding "The Missouri Compromise, 1820."which is true is A<u> ----No new territories would be allowed to have </u><u>slavery.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?</h3>
The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to maintain a balance between the number of slave states and the number of free states in the Union. It permits Missouri to enter as a slave state at the same Maine would be as a free state, thus maintaining a balance in numbers of free and slave states<u>.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the Missouri Compromise ?</h3>
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, was a law that tried the attention of growing sectional tensions over the issue of slavery. By passing this law, President James Monroe signed, the U.S. Congress admitted Missouri to the Union as a state that allowed slavery, and Maine regarded as a free state.
Learn more about Missouri Compromise:
brainly.com/question/14383383
#SPJ1
Letter A. is the answer. Lincoln's 10 percent Plan was not a plan for Reconstruction.
<span>After the Civil War, Congress created plans to rebuild the nation, readmit the southern states and give citizen rights to African Americans. This comprehensive plan to have the Union physically and politically back together was called as “Reconstruction.” </span>
<em>Booker T Washington</em> philosophy is racial solidarity, self-help and accommodation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In every century you will find great leaders. Similarly, Booker T Washington was a great leader of his time. He entered this world in the year 1856 and went away after giving all this works on 1915. Booker T Washington is mostly remembered because he was a black leader. This man was a wonderful educator, reformer and as I said a great leader who gave philosophy in self-help, ethnic solidarity and accommodation. He urged blacks to accept discrimination is for a small time and motivated them all the time. He trusted in giving education through crafts, industrial and farming techniques and the enterprise and thrift and many more.
In general yes, the states honored their agreement since the Articles of Confederation demanded practically nothing from the states--meaning that it wasn't hard for the states to uphold their end of the bargain.
