Answer:so they can have rights with different people and not just have the same people over again
Explanation:
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. It would be political science that should not be considered a subarea of criminology. Political science<span> is a social </span>science<span> discipline that deals with systems of government, and the analysis of </span>political<span> activities, </span>political<span> thoughts and </span>political<span> behaviour.</span>
Answer:
n a free market economy, the law of supply and demand, rather than a central government, regulates production and labor. Companies sell goods and services at the highest price consumers are willing to pay while workers earn the highest wages companies are willing to pay for their services.
Explanation:
:)
