I am answering this from experience. If you stop a car and you know that the person driving has a felony first of all a felon is not allowed to carry a weapon or have one in his or or presents at all times if they are cought with one they go to jail. Secondly if I pull over someone and they have a history of Violence with a deadly weapon or in general I will call for backup. You never go head on in a situation when you don't know if the suspect has a weapon inside of the car or on them. When backup arrives you start commanding the driver to step out of the car. If the driver does not come out of the car we walk up slowly but we make sure we have backup first. Never just walk up to a car with a driver who has a felony of assault with a deadly weapon because you have no idea what to expect. I hope that this has answered your question
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representatives tacitly acknowledged slavery and kept the Southern slave states from rejecting the Constitution. It was called the Three-Fifths Compromise.
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from the southern states and delegates from the northern states during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate centered on on the fact whether slaves would be counted at the same time as determining the total population of a state to determine legislative representation and for taxative functions. The matter was important, while that population number then used to determine how many seats the state would have in the House of Representatives for the next ten years. The effect was to give the southern states one-third more seats in Congress and one-third more votes they would otherwise have, allowing slave interests to largely dominate the United States government until 1865.
Answer: give her a warning
Explanation:
That a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the United States' constitution if it lacks a secular purpose, has its primary effect as promoting or inhibiting religion, or fosters an excessive entanglement of government with religion.
Used to assess whether a law violates the Establishment Clause. The "Establishment Clause" was intended to prevent any governmental endorsement or support of religion.
