I think your answer will be Great Britain but I’m not sure
The correct answer should be <span>It states that genocide has not occurred.
They state that there were killings and that there was displacement and that they were both planned and organized, but the intent was not to commit a genocide but rather to fight political opponents, so it's not genocide because it wasn't motivated by eliminating the existence of ethnicities. </span><span />
This condition is now as physical dependence.
Answer:
<h3>B.</h3>
Explanation:
https://www.historyhit.com/1963-kenyan-independence/
This link has some great info, specifically the section "Mau Mau Uprising" read about all the death and I think it makes sense. The other very plausible option could be D. but I don't think it was classifiably an "armed revolution"
A) Both armies resorted to brutal and extreme measures, not even close to a negotiation
B) In the second paragraph it states that Britain had an imperial branch controlling this
C) So many people dies in this, far from peace
D) While it could be this one I feel it more organized than simple and "armed revolution"