Answer:
The answer is "No"
Explanation:
With the end of the Cold War, researchers found religions development as a ground breaking political power in the contemporary world however it might have been there from the start.
Similarly as there isn't simple approach to characterize religion, so there is no relapse examination conceivable to state when religion is a significant reason alone, when it is a significant however auxiliary reason, and when it is a guise used to encourage war. History is, all things considered, not a science. Yet, religion, when used by a state, causes battle to appear to be good by legitimating it as in reason, declaring that murdering is morally supported, and giving comfort to the dispossessed.
It looked like Europe now. But It was calmer back then before WW1
Answer:
choice two
Explanation: don't need one
Answer:
Meeting growing food needs. Providing consumers with high nutritional content (especially protein and long-chain omega-3 fatty acids) content. Reducing waste because feed efficiency of fish and shellfish is better than any other animal.
Explanation:
He supported the Treaty of Versailles.
