1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Whitepunk [10]
3 years ago
6

The table below shows the heights of 6 pairs of brothers and sisters, ​labeled A through F .

Mathematics
1 answer:
scoray [572]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The difference is <em>2 inches</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

Firstly, we identify the equation as given in the question;

y = 1.42105x - 32.2632

We need to know which of the two is the dependent variable i.e y-value and which is the independent variable x-value between the brothers' heights and the sisters' heights. To do this, we have to start with an assumption and check which of the two is for the brothers' or for the sisters,

Let's say the brothers' heights is x, we select any of the data points; (68,64)

we input this into the line of best fit equation; 64 =1.42105(68) - 32.2632 = 96.6314-32.2632=  64.3682

We can see the value on the left hand side of the equation correlates with that on the right hand side. This confirms our assumption that the brothers' heights refer to the independent variable x.

Now, let's plug the values for the 71 inches heights

y = 1.42105(71) - 32.2632 = 68.63 approximately 64

In the table, we can see that the predict sister height at that particular data point is 71 inches. The difference between the predicted height and the actual height is thus 71-69 = 2 inches  

You might be interested in
Helpppppppppppp plss with this problem
3241004551 [841]

Given :7872 ÷ 305.

Because it's estimation. So, we need to estimate the number 7872 to 8000.

In order to divide 8000 by a number we need to estimate 305 to the 400. Because 400 is exact divisor of 8000.

If we divide 8000 by 400 we get 20.

And it's obviously less then 60000 ÷ 300= = 200.

20 < 200.

<h3>Therefore, Harrison is absolutely correct.</h3>
6 0
3 years ago
What will happen to the measures of central tendency if the outlier is removed
frosja888 [35]
It decreases the number of data by one.
7 0
2 years ago
The length of a rectangle is 3 cm less than twice the width. If the perimeter is 42 cm, what is the length of the rectangle?
larisa [96]

Answer:

The length is 13

Step-by-step explanation:

w+w+l+l= perimeter

if the length is 3m less than twice the width then let's do some math.

42 divided 2 =21. so the width and length of one side have to equal 21. For example, let's use 8 as the width. The length would be twice(16) minus three(13) 13 plus 8 is 21. WOW it equals half of it so no we know the length is 13 and the wdith is 8.

6 0
3 years ago
I am an improper fraction whose numerator and denominator are made of odd digits only. In my simplest form, my representation as
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

The fraction is =  \frac{21}{9}

Step-by-step explanation:

In simplest form the fraction is represented in mixed number as 2\frac{1}{3}.

The fraction form of the mixed number can be given as :

2\frac{1}{3}=\frac{7}{3}

Let the fraction be = \frac{7x}{3x} [As multiplying same numbers to numerator and denominator does not affect the proportion.

Sum of numerator and denominator is = 30

This, can be represented as:

7x+3x=30

Solving for x.

10x=30

Dividing both sides by 10.

\frac{10x}{10}=\frac{30}{10}

x=3

So, the fraction will be = \frac{7\times 3}{3\times 3}

⇒ \frac{21}{9}

3 0
3 years ago
When we’re writing, we can use a thesaurus to find a different word with the same meaning to present an idea. How can we find di
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

Math has the particularity that it is a logical construction.

This means that we can start with an expression X (where X is an equation, not a variable)

Now we can apply a lot of "math" to this equation in such a way that we can rewrite it, but the actual "meaning" of the equation will not change.

An example of this is factoring.

For example, we can write a quadratic equation as:

a*x^2 + b*x + c.

And we also can write this as:

n*(x - k)*(x - j)

where k and j are the solutions of the equation:

a*x^2 + b*x + c  = 0.

What is the advantage of writing the equation in each form?

Well, both expressions actually represent the same thing, but the explicit information in each expression is different, so depending on what we want to do, we will choose one option or the other.

And we have lot's of different ways to express something, where we can find some ones really complex and useful, like the series of Taylor, where we can write a function as a summation of infinite terms.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does “normal space” refer to? Justify your answer.
    12·1 answer
  • A number is more then 9 units from 5
    6·1 answer
  • 13530 grams is equal to how many kilograms
    9·2 answers
  • Choose the question that has only one possible answer.
    10·1 answer
  • Issac’s paper airplane flew 5 2/12 feet. Lillian’s paper airplane flew 5 5/12 feet. How much farther did Lillian’s paper airplan
    14·2 answers
  • Find the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle if the legs each measure 10<br> feet
    13·1 answer
  • Which choice is similar to the figure shown?<br><br> Please help I’m confused on what to do.
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME
    10·2 answers
  • You have 2\3 of a pizza left from yesterday. You divide it into 4 equal pieces. What fraction of the pizza is each piece?​
    9·1 answer
  • What is the slope of the line through (- 7 8 and 0 4?; What is the slope of the line that passes through the points − 1 − 7 − 1
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!