The statement "The form of learning in which a neutral stimulus becomes associated with a stimulus to which the subject has an automatic inborn response is called classical conditioning" is<u>:</u> <u>True</u>
Classic conditioning refers to the method of learning where things are unconsciously imbibed and becomes a part of the person.
This happens when there is an automatic response which is associated with a stimulus so that a behavior can be created.
There are three stages of classic conditioning which are:
- Acquisition
- Before Acquisition
- After Acquisition
An example would be if a child sees his parent with a belt or cane and he whips him for a wrongdoing, next time the child sees his parent with the belt or cane, he believes he is about to be flogged, because he has already associated it with the behavior
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/18984542
The Buddha tried to but didn't escape into enlightenment after many months of meditation and starving himself and becoming poor and that's when he found that when you have nothing you have no worries and when you have nothing you have everything and that is when he found enlightenment
Answer:
Bias from affiliation
Explanation:
A party wants it politicians to benefit it, and whatever will satisfy the public is all that matters; other politicians and others that are worked with may not support the person attempting to address climate change due to their need to bring power to their party. Other nations are also difficult to challenge due to moral beliefs. Climate change is likely greatly caused by the industries of Developing Countries, and their wants to progress, this creates a dilemma, every modernized and 'well-off' nation has done this and had this affect on the Earth at some point.
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
This is an opionic quiestion. to some people, it is because they dont want to be aroound people who lie or who are crazy and weird.
