Answer:
Non-piracy.
Explanation:
If a pharmaceutical research firm prohibits the employees who leave the firm from soliciting business from former customers or clients for a period of two years. This best exemplifies the non-piracy clause.
A non-piracy clause is a legal framework which provides protection for companies from an ex employee who has left. This clause states that ex employees are prohibited from soliciting business from former customers or clients either directly or indirectly for a period of two years.
<em>For instance, if Joyce works for XYZ pharmaceutical company that uses a non-piracy clause and later dropped a resignation letter or was laid off for a disciplinary action, she's prohibited from taking contracts from XYZ' customers for a period of two (2) years. </em>
Answer:
b. Exploratory research
Explanation:
As the sales has been declined in Latin American territory with no knowledge to the team about sudden decline in sales performance therefore, Exploratory research can be helpful as to collect the information through the various means such as focus groups, customer advisory boards etc to know the exact reason for the decline so that the corrective action plan can be formulated
Answer:
b) bonds
Explanation:
Bonds are investment assets. Investors lend money to the government and corporates over a fixed period. In return, the company or the government pays a fixed amount of interest periodically until the agreed fixed period is over( maturity date). At maturity, the investor receives back the full amount he had loaned out (the principal amount).
Bonds are considered a low-risk investment option. Governments hardly default on their bond obligations. Companies that issue bonds to the public regulated and are less likely to default on payments.
Answer:
- The presence of a duty. We all have a duty to take steps to prevent injury from occurring to other people.
- The breach of a duty. The defendant must have failed to live up to his duty to prevent injury from occurring to you.
- An injury. You were injured.
- The injury resulted from the breach.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Project 1
Explanation:
IO PI IRR LIFE
Project 1 $300,000 1.12 14.38% 15 years
Project 2 $150,000 1.08 13.32% 6 years
Project 3 $100,000 1.20 16.46% 3 years
Assume that the cost of capital is 12%.
We should invest in the projects that have the highest profitability index (PI) first.
PI = present value of project's cash flows / initial outlay
Projects with a high PI should also have high IRRs and this applies to this situation:
- Project 3 has a PI of 1.2 and an IRR of 16.46%
- Project 1 has a PI of 1.12 and an IRR of 14.38%
- Project 2 has a PI of 1.08 and an IRR of 13.32%
If the protects weren't mutually exclusive and the company had enough money for the 3 of them, then it should invest in all of them. But that is not the case, here, since the company has to decide in which project it will invest (only 1 project). The first option should be project 3, but since it cannot be repeated, and its life is short, I would go for project 1.
Besides, it is the only possible answer since you have to choose only 1 project (remember projects are mutually exclusive).
