All categories

3 years ago

PLS HELP ASAP!!!!!!!! 2 MORE DAYS OF SCHOOL LEFT ASAP HELP NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

Illusion [34]3 years ago

3 0

I think maybe either B or C, ope I helped, sorry if I didn't!!

You might be interested in

Simplify<br> ^3<br> V-27n^27

Sauron [17]

Apply the radical rule to separate terms:

Cubicroot(-27) and cubic root(n^27)

Cubicroot(-27) = -3

Now you have -3 cubicroot(n^27)

Using the exponent rule

N^27 can be rewritten as (n^9)^3

Now you have -3 cubicroot((n^9)^3)

The cubic root and the 3rd power cancel out to get the final answer of

-3n^9

8 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP MEEEEE!!

vovangra [49]

It appears you are doing well. You have already gotten the eighth answer! If you need any other help you can ask me.

7 0

3 years ago

How many 1/ 4-inch cubes does it take to fill a box with width 2 1/ 4 inches, length 2 1/ 2 inches, and height 1 3/ 4 inches?

lys-0071 [83]

Answer:

630.

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Given the following data;</u>

Dimensions for cube = ¼ inches

$Volume \; of \; cube = \frac {1}{4} * \frac {1}{4} * \frac {1}{4}$

Volume = 1/64 cubic inches.

For rectangular box;

Length = 2½ = 5/2 inches.

Width = 2¼ = 9/4 inches.

Height = 1¾ = 7/4 inches.

$Volume \; of \; cube = \frac {5}{2} * \frac {9}{4} * \frac {7}{4}$

Volume = 315/32 inches

Therefore, to find the amount of cubes;

$Number \; of \; cubes = \frac {Volume \; of \; box}{Volume \; of \; cube}$

Substituting into the equation, we have;

$Number \; of \; cubes = \frac {\frac {315}{32}} {\frac {1}{64}}$

$Number \; of \; cubes = \frac {315}{32} * 64$

$Number \; of \; cubes = 315 * 2$

Number of cubes = 630

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identifying roots - Pre calculus stuff

umka2103 [35]

The answers are 0 and 2

This can be found by looking at the x axis and finding every point where the line crosses

4 0

3 years ago

Precalc experts! I need your help!

mars1129 [50]

Answer:

$f(x)\to 1$

Step-by-step explanation:

The function approaches its horizontal asymptote in both directions as the magnitude of x gets large. The limit is y = 1.

7 0

3 years ago