Answer: There are few ‘laws’ in science. Those ‘laws’ are so named for historical reasons, but they are theoretical in nature. They set out what happens when a theory is applied in practice. A theory is simply the best explanation we have for understanding why some process takes place and predicting what the result will be.
Explanation: Anyone who describes something as “just a theory” does not understand what a theory is. Laws are arbitrary human rules. Theories are severely tested and re-tested explanations of why things happen in the real physical world and can be used to make predictions about outcomes.
Some would say that theories are about why something happens and laws (in science) describe what happens. But this simply makes a scientific ‘law’ a subset of a scientific theory, explaining how to make predictions.

<u>Aerobic </u><u>respiration </u>:- Aerobic respiration is process of respiration in which complete oxidation of glucose takes place in the presence of oxygen
<u>That </u><u>is</u><u>, </u>
<u>Aerobic </u><u>respiration </u><u>is </u><u>takes </u><u>place </u><u>in </u><u>four </u><u>stages </u><u>:</u><u>-</u>
- <u>Glycolysis</u>
- <u>The </u><u>link </u><u>reaction </u>
- <u>The </u><u>Krebs </u><u>cycle </u>
- <u>Oxidative </u><u>phosphorylation </u>
In aerobic respiration, Glucose with 6 carbon atoms broken into 2 pyruvic acid each with 3 carbon atom and produces water + CO2 + energy.
<h3><u>Whereas</u><u>, </u></h3>
<u>Anaerobic </u><u>respiration </u>:- is the process of respiration in which incomplete oxidation of glucose takes place in the absence of oxygen
The end products of glucose in anaerobic respiration is
- <u>In </u><u>human </u><u>muscles</u><u>, </u><u> </u><u>Lactic </u><u>acid </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>Energy </u>
- <u>In </u><u>yeast</u><u>, </u><u>Ethanol </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>CO2</u><u> </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>Energy </u>
<u>Hence</u><u>, </u><u>Option </u><u>D </u><u>is </u><u>the </u><u>correct </u><u>answer</u><u>.</u>
Answer:
Megan should add Maple, 39%
OAmalOHopeO:
Non renewable resources can be very expensive, especially in capital outlay. For example, wind energy is very expensive to get started. The batteries alone are a headache. What do you do with those batteries whose life is over? How do you dispose of them? It isn't an easy problem to solve.
Then there's the labor part of wind energy. If they are manufactured in Denver Co and they receive an order from Maine, the blades require a wooden plywood box to be made. Plywood is roughly 20$ a 1/2 sheet (in Canada) to say nothing of the carpenter needed to make the box. I'm told that it takes a good day and one half just to make that box alone. That's for 1 blade. Then there's the shipping cost for 3 blades. Then there's the cost of making the blades which require highly skilled workers.
Then there's the problem of wind, (or lack thereof). the problems just keep on going up and the expenses with them.