Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
The NIMS Command and Coordination structures that are offsite locations is Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs).
<h3>What is the function of the Emergency Operations Center?</h3>
The Emergency Operations Centers can be described as the centralized location of emergency response that are needed during an accident.
They provide a support operations during incident and helps in the coordination of ICP operations .
Learn more aboutEmergency Operations Centers at:brainly.com/question/14331925
#SPJ1
Answer: Option (A)
Explanation:
Output effect is referred to as the circumstance under which the increase in price of an input will further increase the organizations production costs and thus reduce the level of the output of the commodity, this will further reduces the demand for the other commodity; vice-versa for the decrease. This effect is thus compatible to a manufacturing organization since encouraging production might not be sustainable by further supply of the input at the available pricing levels, therefore causing the production costs to rise further.
