Hello!
When finding the perimeter of a rectangle, you have to consider the properties of a rectangle. A rectangle has two pairs of equal sides where one is the width, while the other one is the length.
Now looking back at your question, it says "... a rectangle that is x units wide" ⇒ you let the width = x ; this is the same with "y units long" ⇒ length = y. Perimeter can just be : P = 24.
Therefore,
The equation would be:
x + x + y + y = P.
2x + 2y = P.
(Sub in P = 24)
∴ 2x + 2y = 24. (This should be your answer.)
:) Good luck (Message me if you have any problem)
Answer:
The answer is 28/9
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one
Given information
We are given that the function is
And we are expected to find f(6), that is substitute the value of x with 6
Step two:
Delete this answer please.
The conditional, <span>If four points are non-coplanar, then they are non-collinear, </span>is true:
This is, coplanarity is a necessary condition to be collinear.
The converse, <span>If four points are non-collinear, then they are non-coplanar, is false.
A counterexample that disproves this statement is the 4 vertices of a paralelogram, of course they are in a same plane and are not collinear.
</span>
Answer:
H0 : μ = 0.107
H1 : μ ≠ 0.107
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim is the alternative hypothesis. H1 ; which is a researcher's opinion that the proportion of Americans aged 65 and above using the internet as changed from the mean value of 10.7% (0.107). The direction of the change is not given, hence. We cannot use the greater or less Than sign as the direction of the change isn't specified by the researcher or data Given. Hence, the shift could be either to the right or left. Hence, the use of the equal to and not equal to sign.
The null will oppose the alternative hypothesis and take the stance that the proportion hasn't changed from the initial mean.
