Answer: True
=================================================
Explanation:
The first amendment prohibits congress from making any law to prohibit free speech, so that means the federal government isn't allowed to restrict speech. However, there are exceptions such as speech to cause a riot, insurrection, obscenities on public airwaves, etc. all of which are not allowed.
In contrast, a private company like Twitter has the choice whether or not to allow or ban a certain post. The first amendment of the constitution does not apply to companies such as this one. On one hand, you could argue that such restriction is a bad thing because it limits speech; but you could also argue that if the government forced companies like Twitter to do a certain action, then it restricts their freedom.
For privately owned social media companies, their platform is something they solely own 100%, meaning that the government does not own or control what goes on that platform. So this is another viewpoint as to why the first amendment doesn't apply to these companies.
In a slight bit of confusing terminology, a private company can be publicly owned. This means that the government doesn't control the company, but rather it's traded on the stock market. Those who own stock in the company are part owners of it. You would have to use the phrasing "government owned and government run" to indicate that the government has full control of such a platform.
There were many problems that farmers were facing back in the late 1800s, and here are some of them:
1. overproduction - they produced a lot of products that not enough people wanted to buy so this ended up with them going to waste
2. low crop prices - even when they did manage to sell some of their goods, they were so cheap that they couldn't earn a lot of money
3. high interest rates - when they asked for money from banks, sometimes they weren't able to pay back that money because of the interest rates
4. high transportation costs - it cost a lot of money to transport the goods they produced
Farmers started forming their own parties and unions to help alleviate these problems, which helped in the long run.
Answer:
direct action
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is called direct action. Like mentioned in the question, Direct Action is a political activist term which refers to a government/military use their power (whether it be economic or physical) in order to directly reach a certain goal or interest as opposed to manipulation and/or negotiation with other authority figures.
Social thinking skill refers to the ability to analyze your interactions with other people and use it to influence their actions. This will be really useful in group settings such as handling a project together with your co-workers.
Constructive thinking skills refers to the ability to analyze every problem around you without puting your motivation down.
