Your next-door neighbors want to go on a European vacation but cannot afford it. so they decide to visit a local amusement park instead. this is an example of the economizing problem.
<h3>What's a profitable problem?</h3>
- Profitable systems as a type of social system must defy and break the three abecedarian profitable problems.
- What kinds and amounts of goods shall be produced," how important and which of indispensable goods and services shall be produced?"
- How shall goods be produced?. by whom and with what coffers( using what technology).?"
- For whom are the goods or services produced? Who benefits? Samuelson reworded this question as" how is the aggregate of the public product to be distributed among different individualities and families?
<h3>Why is the scrimping problem important?</h3>
- All societies face the profitable problem, which is the problem of how to make the stylish use of limited, or scarce, coffers.
- The profitable problem exists because, although the requirements and wants of people are endless, the coffers available to satisfy requirements and wants are limited.
Learn more about economizing problem here:
brainly.com/question/15505681
#SPJ4
Answer:
Definitely the first one not sure what other?
Protein Vitamins Minerals Carbohydrates are nutritional component is most important for a patient with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (mods)
<h3>
What are the major aims of shock treatment?</h3>
- The goal of shock management is to prevent anaerobic metabolism in the tissue.
- Volume resuscitation is critical in the resuscitation of the critically hypovolemic patient.
- The goal of shock management is to understand the interdependence of the pump, the container, and the fluid, the systems for monitoring their functioning, and the strategies for returning them to normal.
learn more about shock management refer:
brainly.com/question/28261245
#SPJ4
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
