Yes an amendment can be proposed
False. They are ascribed status’.They are something you are born with, you cannot change it to better yourself or achieve a higher status. An example of a achieved status would be personal skills, as you can change it.
Answer: I´m not following you. You mean like cheating while I´m doing my job (predict)?
Explanation: Working in the stock market might be classified as "it´s a dirty job, but someone has to do it", and it doesn´t matter. There´s no such thing as cheating or playing dirty. Earning your salary by predicting other people incomes an outcomes it´s just as any other job, and the position or situation of those people, it´s just a part of your job.
Answer:
Employment, property and family law.
Explanation:
The ERA has to be considered in its historical context. It was first proposed in 1923, at a time where women had little or no rights regarding work and payment and faced discrimination. The ERA proposed a total abolition of law discrimination based on sex, which would have been revolutionary at the time. Later, during the 1960s and 1970s when the ERA was again discussed, some of the problems were solved with other laws, like the Equal Pay Act or the Civil Rights Acts. However, while these acts are a key part of American Legislation, the ERA is a Constitutional Amendment, which would give a completely new level of protection.
There is criticism, mainly because many of the laws and guarantees gained during the past 100 years have been tailored to protect women in their specificity. And many fear that the ERA would negatively override those protections. However, as an Amendment, any discrimination based on sex could be challenged based on unconstitutionality. And as of now, women still suffer discrimination and the acts and laws enacted so far are not sufficient.
The answer is: his study does not qualify as an experiment. For the study to be an experiment, Dr. Kline would have to manipulate the independent variable in a group (for example, apply a certain treatment) and also have a control group to which he doesn’t apply such treatment.
In this case, the study is an observational study because he only observed the subjects that were in the zoo that morning and measured the variable of his interest, that is the environmental attitude of the visitors, he did not apply a certain treatment to the group nor manipulate any variable.
