Michael would argue that Ramses the Second died of causes that are not to be known as it is impossible to figure them out.
Explanation:
Bruno Latour is known for his work in the studies in the filed of science and technology studies. However, his study of the practice of science was indeed at one time associated with the post truth and social constructionist movements and approaches.
Michael to take a constructionist stance would be to assume that it is impossible for such a statement to be made regarding an ancient King on the basis of meager evidence for his tuberculosis.
So he would insist that it cannot be known how he died.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
it's a. the study of mental processes and behavior.
Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be through a "mutual understanding," since this was the purpose of the Berlin Conference.
