They both get payed, they both help the community, they both deal with pretty gross things as well.
The <em>person </em>who Maria should contact to find out if she is allowed to use the nickname is:
- <u>The original author of the popular book series</u>
According to the given question, we are asked to show the person who Maria would contact if she would make use of a nickname from a popular book series and also using similar personality features.
As a result of this, we can see that if Maria goes ahead to make use of this nickname, she could be sued for intellectual theft because she is not only <em>using the same nickname</em>, but also same personality traits.
With this in mind, Maria should contact the owner of the popular book series to <em>get her consent</em> to make use of the nickname.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/20901151
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Intrinsic means "internal/inner" here. The satisfaction with oneself for a job well done is an internal motivator, while a pay rise/promotion is a direct outside motivator and good working conditions are an indirect outside motivator.
Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
The group of rats that would develop a conditioned taste aversion to saccharin-flavored water is "the experimental group initially introduced to saccharin-flavored water."
This is because the experimental group would feel it is the saccharin-flavored water they drank that caused them illness instead of understanding that the radiation could make them ill.
This is based on the findings made by Garcia & Koehling on taste aversion and biological preparedness.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that "the experimental group initially introduced to saccharin-flavored water" is the group of rats that would cultivate a conditioned taste aversion to saccharin-flavored water.
The full question is:
There were two groups of rats: an experimental group initially introduced to saccharin-flavored water and the control group that was not.
Both groups of rats were then exposed to radiation that made them ill. They were exposed to this just once. Then, both groups were given saccharin-flavored water to see if they would avoid it.
Which group of rats would develop a conditioned taste aversion to saccharin-flavored water?
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21660703
