Answer:Competency to stand trial (CST), according to the Dusky standard, has two basic components to its definition. The first component refers to the accused<u> individual's </u><u>Ability to interact rationally with an attorney</u> The second component refers to the accused individual's <u>understanding how the court process work.</u>
Explanation:
Competency to Stand Trial is a a legal construct that states that an individual or defendant should be able to understand the nature, reason and purpose of a legal proceedings against him and should be able to effectively interact rationally with an attorney or counsel in his defense. Such defendant should be able to understand the type of charges against him or her , the court room and the participants included, also he should be able to cooperate with his attorney by giving details to in terms of facts including reasons and causes of his actions for offence alleged on him or her so as to enable the attorney challenge witnesses on his behalf
Only an individual who does not show a mental disorder or defect can understand this conditions and cooperate with an attorney, In cases where individuals try to feign mental disorder, a Psychological testing is carried out so as to show competency for such individual to stand trial .
China was named after its first emperor war.
True.
<span>This seems to be a way to reduce anxiety and desensitize herself to the experience. When
we have a traumatic event, psychologists always recommend talking about
the topic, because doing so we do a process called catharsis, which
consists in expressing our emotions through speech or any other type of
expression. <span>The more we do catharsis the more we will lower anxiety levels and desensitize ourselves on the subject.
I hope my answer can h
</span></span>
What distinguishes Jack Katz from other sociologists is that
most of the focus on the background of the individual as the maybe most
important factor that predisposes them to committing deviant acts. Instead Katz
argues that what the perpetrators experience while committing those acts can
help researchers better understand their actions. He shows this with the example of a young shoplifter who shoplifts not because he needs the thing he steels but because he likes the rush of the act itself.
