Answer:
Developing nations are concerned with commodity price stabilization because of the following reasons
- There are high price elasticity of supply and demand for many commodities
- Developing economies are often highly dependent on the export of just one or a few commodities.
Explanation:
In recent decades there has been growing concern about the sharp fluctuations of primary product prices, the effects of those fluctuations on particular groups of producers and particular countries, and the measures which might be taken to reduce or offset the fluctuations.
Producing countries have been dominated by proposals for stabilizing world prices of commodities, in particular via the establishment of a “Common Fund” within the framework of UNCTAD's Integrated Program for Commodities.
However, developing nations are concerned with commodity price stabilization because of the two reasons provided above which could result in inflation and deflation.
Answer:
These statements would fit well in an apology letter:
- Make a promise that it won't happen again - Putting the wrong date is a very serious and very strange mistake at the same time. It's strange because professionals usually do not make that kind of mistake, and it's serious because it can completely distort as schedule, as it happened in this case.
- Apologize sincerely - again, as the mistake was serious and strange at the same time, an apology is necessary.
- Accept responsability - accepting responsability for one's actions is not only the professional thing to do, but also the ethical thing to do.
And this statement is appropriate when presenting a bad newsletter:
- If the reason or explanation is not confidential and will not create legal liability - giving out specific information in a corporate context can result in legal liabilities that potentially cost a lot of money, therefore, it is important to carefully choose one's words, while at the same time being honest with the reader.
Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
Answer:
conflict of loyalty
Explanation:
In simple words, conflict of loyalty refers to a specific type of situation in which an individual faces a conflict of interest due to having loyalty towards two different parties which have different goals and objectives.
This scenario usually happens when someone in authority has to make a decision that can affect party he or she have personal relation or with the other party with with which that individual have a professional relation.
As per the modern theories, under such scenarios, individual in authority should favor professional relations over personal relations.
Answer:
Garza's net sales equals $143250.
Explanation:
Net sales = gross sales - sales return - sales discount
= $149,000 - $3,525 - $2,225
= $143250
Therefore, Garza's net sales equals $143250.
