Yes it is true that she kisses him when Romeo claims that saints have lips and can therefore kiss, but it should be noted that there is some hesitation at first.
Answer:
A) too
Explanation:
The answer would be A since:
B is the number two. For example, "Can I have 2(two) pies please"
C is like giving something to someone. For example, " From (Y/n) to (Name)"
And finally A is like wanting to be included in something also (Just an example, not the actual definition) For example, "Can I go to the waterpark too?"
<u><em>In conclusion, the answer would be A) too :)</em></u>
<u><em>Hope this helped</em></u>
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
Dan should be followed by the comma.
Answer: The key similarities between "the death of Ivan llyich and "painting the screem" is that: both works show the artists' struggle with the concept of the afterlife.
Leo Tolstoy, a writer, is a great man in literature while Edvard Munch is a world renowned painter of "The Scream".
Tolstoy's work of "The Death of Ivan Ilyich" shows the primacy and elision of death, the consequences of living without meaning and without abiding to true connection of one's life.
Another similarity between Edvard and Tolstoy is their expression on human dependency on material needs. As a relation to Tolstoy's work, Edvard Munch work demonstrates the dependency of humans on their mateiral needs.
