Answer:
Ecological correlation
Step-by-step explanation:
According to a different source, the options that come with this question are:
- Ecological correlation
- Extrapolation
- Lurking variable
- Influential observation
Sarah should be careful about the use of an ecological correlation. An ecological correlation describes two variables that are group means, as opposed to a correlation between two variables that describe individuals. In this case, Sarah did pick 75 random students in each state. However, she then obtained the height and weight means for each state, and proceeded to compare these. Therefore, Sarah is not comparing individual values, but means. It is important to notice this, because correlations at a group level can be much higher than those at the individual level.
The length and the width of the rectangle are 20 and 14 inches respectively
<h3>How to find the length and width?</h3>
The given parameters are:
Length = 6 + Width
Perimeter = 68 inches
The perimeter of a rectangle is calculated as:
Perimeter = 2 * (Length + Width)
So, we have:
2 * (Length + Width) = 68
Divide both sides by 2
Length + Width = 34
Substitute Length = 6 + Width in Length + Width = 34
6 + Width + Width = 34
Evaluate the like terms
2 * Width = 28
Divide both sides by 2
Width = 14
Substitute Width = 14 in Length = 6 + Width
Length = 6 + 14
Evaluate
Length = 20
Hence, the length and the width of the rectangle are 20 and 14 inches respectively
Read more about perimeter at:
brainly.com/question/24571594
#SPJ1
To best emphasize the number of defects. Manager should use graph 3 (refer the image shown):
If we talk about graph 1, it can also be used but usually we put the time line on the horizontal axis, for the convenience and the quantity to be measured on the y-axis. In the graph 1, the time is placed on the vertical axis (x-axis) so it would not be a good pick for the manager.
Same is the case with graph 2 again we have time on the vertical axis. So it is not a good idea to with graph 2.
Graph 3 could be the best to emphasize the number of defects because first of all time is placed on the horizontal axis and the quantity to be shown is on the vertical axis. Secondly, the range of the vertical axis is less so it is easy to observe the data set on the graph quite distinctively. Therefore, graph 3 is the best pick.
Graph 4 is placed correctly in terms of vertical and horizontal axes but the range of vertical axis is quite high due to which the dispersion or the display of the data is quite compressed and it gets hard to visualize.
Answer:
perimeter = 25.13feets
Step-by-step explanation:
width = 25/6 feet
Area = 35 square feet
lenght = Area/width = (35*6)/25 = 8.4feets
perimeter of the rectangle = 2(25/6 + 8.4) = 25.13 feets
