Answer:
Correct answers are
They were under supplied.
They had wet gunpowder.
They were outnumbered.
Explanation:
The last option is correct as their gunpowder was totally wet, and were not able to use it in the battle, because their trench was flooded.
First option is also correct, as they didn't have much supplies, and most of them were destroyed.
Second option is also correct as they were outnumbered 2 to 1, and a lot of soldiers were killed and wounded.
Third option is not correct as he never issued such order.
Hello!
The new deal is the exact inverse of letter d), once it actually claims the state controle over the economy.
The wrong alternative is d).
Yes because national crises causes stress and people to sway their opinion.
The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
