The question asks, "What is YOUR philosophy?" I can't really tell you what YOU should think ... but I can present for you the ideas of a couple different political philosophers who took opposing stands on the issue.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers who wrote during the 17th century.
Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). The people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. That was Hobbes' view.
John Locke famously published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690. According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government. </em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
As you write your own answer to this question for your class, you will want to decide, perhaps, if you agree more with Hobbes, that security and stability are most important ... or with Locke, that the authority and liberty of the people are always paramount.
Below are the questions:
<span>The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to _____ .
A. Difference in values
B. Difference in scientific judgements
C. Difference in perception versus reality
</span>
The answer is C. Difference in perception versus reality
Answer:
"to grasp the native's point of view, his relation to life, to realize his vision of his world"
Explanation:
Bronisław Kasper Malinowski (1884 – 1942) was an anthropologist whose writings in his field made major impact on the discipline of anthropology.
The statement, "to grasp the native's point of view, his relation to life, to realize his vision of his world" is an excerpt from his work, Argonauts of the Western Pacific, Dutton 1961 edition, p. 25. This quote from Malinowski tried to explain the anthropologist's view of other culture and how the anthropologist should approach it.
:
With respect to the steps of the scientific method, Franz is: Reporting results
<u>Explanation:</u>
A manner for experimentation that is practiced to examine notes and clarify topics is termed as the scientific method. An iterative process is a scientific method that includes so upholding up and recurring during this scientific method. To complete your science research you will report your results to others in a concluding report and/or display board.
Expert scientists do virtually exactly the same thing by issuing their final report in a scientific journal or by manifesting their effects on a poster or during a speech at a scientific meeting. Here based on gathered data Franz is concluding his research by delivering the result to the audience.
Thomas gibbons won the case in 1824
