A type of comedy that is exaggerated and often stereotyped is called "Satire".
CORRECT ANSWER:
there is no
so is the consequent
a whole may
does not constitute
there is no
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
To have an argument, you must have a factual claim and an inferential claim. This means that at least one statement in an argument must claim to present evidence, and there must be a claim that this evidence implies something. In a conditional statement, <em><u>there is no</u></em> assertion that either the antecedent or the consequent is true. Rather there is only the assertion that if the antecedent is true, then <u><em>is the consequent .</em></u>Of course, a conditional statement as <u><em>a whole way present</em></u> evidence because it asserts a relationship between statements. Yet when conditional statements are taken in this sense, a single conditional statement <u><em>does not constitute</em></u> an argument because <u><em>there is no</em></u> separate claim that this evidence implies anything.
Could you please make sure that you typed that right cus it does not make sense?:)
The three ways that amendments made to the U.S in the 1900s changed the voting process are:
1. In first place, the ratified amendment number 17th (submitted in 1912) determined the Senators election thorough popular vote.
2. In second place, the ratified amendment number 19th (submitted in 1919) forbided the refusal of the right to vote due to sex reasons, and from that moment nobody could prohibit to women to vote in the U.S.
3. And finally in third place, the ratified amendment number 24th (submitted in 1962) forbided the revocation of the voting rights owing to a poll tax payment lack or another payment tax absense.
Answer:
sounds sus to me... u sus?
Explanation:
have a great day :)