1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-s [515]
3 years ago
9

A police officer was patrolling a neighborhood, when he observed Fred, a known drug dealer, casually enter a home carrying a bla

ck bag. The officer suspected that the bag contained drugs, so the officer approached Fred’s home and kicked open the door. Once inside the home, he discovered several bundles of cocaine. Is evidence of the cocaine seized from the home admissible?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Llana [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No, because the officer lacked a search warrant to enter Fred's home, nor did he meet any of the exceptions to the warrant requirement.

Explanation:

For the evidence of cocaine seized at Fred's house to be admissible it would be necessary for the police officer to have a search warrant, as he had not, the evidence (though true) is inadmissible. A search warrant is a court document that authorizes police officers to conduct a search for evidence on anyone's property. A police officer can only search for evidence if he has a search warrant.

You might be interested in
Discuss how motivation and emotion can affect university student’s academic and social life​
ale4655 [162]

students cry because of emotion

4 0
2 years ago
The framers of the U.S. Constitution believed that the document should contain what important underlying principle?
Allushta [10]
The framers of the United States Constitution believed that the document should contain the underlying principles that would make the central government not too weak but also not having the absolute power as well. It wanted the balance to remain so that at no point of time it would become a dictatorship rule.Before this United States Constitution came into force, the central government was too weak under the Articles of Confederation. Separation of power and checks and balances were two things that actually showed that the Constitution was made to make the central government neither too weak nor too strong.
4 0
3 years ago
How would a tariff effect trumps businesses
neonofarm [45]
It would add tax to his businesses
7 0
2 years ago
In case the president is disabled, the way the vice president becomes president is determined by the
kompoz [17]
By the 25th amendment 
7 0
2 years ago
An expert on parenting is addressing parents at the local grade school. when the topic of punishment is discussed, what is one o
prisoha [69]
On the topic of school, Suspension.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How is nation a part of who you are?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is the ability to speak and understand language so remarkable?
    5·1 answer
  • Martin Luther King's letter was published in a national periodical. Who do you think he considered his target audience for the l
    8·1 answer
  • Who must respect the rights of citizens according to John Locke
    11·1 answer
  • Are there groups in this country that are at a higher risk of living in poverty? Explain. What are some of the challenges for ch
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following did the u.s. government attempt to do during World War I​
    8·2 answers
  • Reflexión sobre los cambios que deben experimentar los partidos políticos para lograr la credibilidad ante los ciudadanos
    13·1 answer
  • Why did DeSoto come to<br> the area known today as<br> Georgia?
    8·1 answer
  • I need help on social studies
    5·1 answer
  • How did the shang rulers gain power?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!