Answer:
Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE
Explanation:
What is Partnership
Partnership is a form of business, where individuals come together to carry on business with the primary intention of making profit. Mostly, they come together by contributing capital and expertise to make the business work . Every partner is however liable and responsible for both the profit made and the losses or liabilities of the partnership.
Although the general partner has unlimited liability, every partner is however jointly and severely liable for the business
Were Summemour and Hatcher Liable?
This case is referred in the J.T. Turner Construction Company v. Summerour and Hatcher(2009). The court this case declared that both Hatcher and Summemour were jointly and severally liable as a result of the following reasons.
A partner becomes liable especially for a prior judgment based on the following
1. The partnership has proven indebtedness
2. A general partner in the partnership was sued to court
Based on these, Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is negligent hiring .
Explanation:
Negligent claim can be defined as a legal claim made by an individual ( who can be an employee or customer ) against the employer, because the individual has been injured by the employee who has a history of doing such incidents with others. This hiring claim ( negligent ) argues that the employer should have know about the history of such employees who are threat to other employees and customers.
Answer:
The correct answer is: supply side economics.
Explanation:
Supply-side economics is a macroeconomic theory which advocates lowering of taxes and decrease in regulation to boost economic growth. It is directly in contrast to demand-side economics.
This theory focuses on reducing taxes, decreasing regulations on producers and declining borrowing rates.
This theory states that economic growth can be stimulated by boosting investments through tax reduction.
Answer:
1. $46,550
2. $405,000
3. $450,600
Explanation:
1. Computation of differential cost regarding the decision to buy the model 200
Differential cost = Cost of a new model 300 - Cost of a new model 200
Differential cost = $396,350 - $349,800
Differential cost = $46,550
So, the differential cost regarding decision to buy model 200 is $46,550.
2. Sunk costs are the costs which are already incurred by the entity in the past and which are not relevant to decision made today. In this case, sunk cost is the cost of the machine purchased seven years ago for $405,000.
3. Opportunity cost is the profit forgone by chosen alternative course of action. In this case, the Opportunity cost regarding the decision to invest in the model 200 machine is $450,600.
Answer:
B - happiness
Explanation:
cause it's not a must for a person to be happy
