1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leviafan [203]
3 years ago
5

In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goo

ds. The government's decision reflects their assessment that:_________
Social Studies
1 answer:
konstantin123 [22]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost

Explanation:

In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>

In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.

You might be interested in
Which supporter of the Constitution was not an author of the Federalist Papers?
satela [25.4K]

Many supporters of the Constitution were not the Federalist papers’ authors comprising John Adams, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. Moreover, The Federalist Papers is a corpus of 85 articles and articles written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in the pseudonym "Publius" to indorse the approval of the United States Constitution.

 

EXPLANATION:  

At the time of publication, The Federalist Papers’ authors tried to hide their identities because Hamilton and Madison attended the convention. Smart observers, however, correctly distinguish the identities of Hamilton, Madison, and Jay. Building on the authenticity of essay writing composed of The Federalist Papers is not always clear. After Alexander Hamilton died in 1804, a list appeared, appealing that he himself had written two-thirds of The Federalist's essay. Some consider that some of these essays were written by James Madison (No. 49-58 and 62-63).

The scientific detective work of Douglass Adair in 1944 suggested the following authorship, validated in 1964 by computer text analysis:

• Alexander Hamilton (51 articles: Nos. 1, 6–9, 11–13, 15–17, 21–36, 59–61, and 65–85)

• James Madison (29 articles: Nos. 10, 14, 18–20, 37–58 and 62–63)

• John Jay (5 articles: Nos. 2–5 and 64).

In six months, a total of 85 essays were written by those three men. Hamilton was one of the three representatives of New York at the Constitutional Convention. He had been a major advocate for national constitutional reform in the 1780s and in 1789 became the first Secretary of the Treasury, a position he held until his resignation in 1795.

Madison, so-called the father of the Constitution—although he repeatedly rejected this honor in his lifetime, became a prominent member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Virginia (1789-1797), Secretary of State (1801-1809), and finally the fourth President of the United States (1809-1817).

John Jay, who had been secretary for foreign affairs in the Articles of Confederation from 1784 in their termination in 1789, turned out to be the first United States Chief Justice in 1789, stepping down in 1795 to take the election as New York’s governor, a post he was detained for two terms, retired in 1801.

LEARN MORE:  

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Unlike the Anti-Federalists, the Federalists believed? brainly.com/question/1205372

• The anti-federalist wanted to? brainly.com/question/8398041

KEYWORDS : Federalist Papers, Constitution, Hamilton, Madison, John Jay  

Subject  : Social Studies

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : Federalist Papers

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A school administrator wants to get a sample of students to find out about students' opinions of the school mascot. She wants to
sukhopar [10]

Answer: HOPE THIS HELPED! :D ;P

Stratified

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
"Adam was amazed at his ability to lie, the way his mind had been quick to invent a new set of circumstances for himself and his
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

It is not always necessary to lie.

Explanation:

Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.

From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of  their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lisa’s palms start to sweat, her heart rate increases, and her stomach does flip-flops. In contrast, Tori’s face flushes, her mu
lora16 [44]

Answer:

James-Lange                    

Explanation:

James-Lange theory: In psychology, the James-Lange theory is described as one of the theories of emotions which was proposed by Carl Lange and William James. The theory states that an individual will interpret his or her physical reactions and after that made a conclusion of getting frightened.

According to this theory, an individual will interpret a particular physical reaction in response to the stimulus as "fear". However, a person feels frightened and then rush.

In the question above, the given statement is best explained by the James-Lange theory of emotion.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please i really need this question Why was trade important in medieval times?
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

D I am 75% sure

Explanation:

Lmk If it's wrong

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the original states were landed states
    12·1 answer
  • Congress and the president decide that the united states should reduce air pollution by reducing its use of gasoline. they impos
    13·1 answer
  • Maria, a latin american, is engaged to leon, an african american. despite their different backgrounds, they consider themselves
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a correct argument in favor of emotional intelligence (EI)?
    8·1 answer
  • VERY SHORT 10PTS HELP Write three complete sentences about a time in your life when you either showed grit or wished you had sho
    9·1 answer
  • What event is most similar to a Dia de los Muertos celebration?
    8·1 answer
  • Help pls, it’s urgent
    8·1 answer
  • Please do quickly. I have a tight schedule
    7·1 answer
  • What was the name of the written language of the Cherokee? choose one please
    10·2 answers
  • What is the Federalist party considered now a days?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!