1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhannawk [14.2K]
3 years ago
12

In the savanna, an ostrich and gazelle feed next to each other and alert each other to danger. Both species have different sight

zones and can each spot potential danger in a different way. The ostrich and gazelle are an example of ___.
Social Studies
1 answer:
gregori [183]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is mutualism

Explanation: Mutualism is an ecological relationship between individuals of different species in which everyone involved benefits. It may be mandatory or not.

You might be interested in
Story the lottery by Shirley Jackson Which of the following describes a theme of text
S_A_V [24]

Answer: B

Explanation: sometimes a few people mostly sacrificed to ensure the group survival.

3 0
3 years ago
The group in Congress that favored war with Great Britain was called the "___."
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer: War Hawks

Explanation: Known as the “War Hawks,” they were mostly young politicians from hailing from the West and South. Led by new Speaker of the House Henry Clay, this small group of Jeffersonian Republicans pressed for a military confrontation to redress American grievances.

5 0
3 years ago
The following question refers to ñA Christmas Memoryî by Truman Capote.
stiks02 [169]
The correct answer should be B. Going to the movies

In all other activities the participation is reciprocal, meaning they both actively participate in the activity with one another.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does democracy require participation in government by all groups
Brums [2.3K]

Apo

Explanation

La democracia participativa es una forma de democracia en la que los ciudadanos tienen mayor participación en la toma de las decisiones políticas que la que les otorga tradicionalmente la democracia representativa. La democracia participativa permite una participación ciudadana mayor que en democracia representativa pero menor que en la llamada democracia directa y equivalente en muchos de sus mecanismos a la democracia semidirecta.

Sus antecedentes ideológicos hacen «una distinción entre el individualismo –al estilo de Rousseau– y la dignidad de la persona humana. Como individuo, el ser humano no es más que un fragmento de la sociedad, pero como persona investida de su dignidad y derechos, es depositario de los intereses y aspiraciones de la sociedad en pleno.»1​ Este concepto lo desarrolló ampliamente Jacques Maritain en dos de sus obras: Humanismo Integral y El Hombre y el Estado. Además, Sir Arthur Lewis, laureado con el Premio Nobel, señaló que todos aquellos afectados por una decisión deben tener la oportunidad de participar en el proceso de tomar esa decisión, ya sea en forma directa o mediante representantes electos.2​

Su mecanismo puede definirse con mayor precisión como un modelo político que facilita a la ciudadanía su capacidad de asociarse y organizarse de tal modo que puedan ejercer una influencia directa en las decisiones públicas. En la actualidad se manifiesta usualmente por medio de una diversidad de procedimientos, como presupuestos participativos, consejos vecinales o comunales o consultas populares.3​ En una etapa más avanzada, el proyecto fundamental de la democracia participativa es la creación de un mecanismo de deliberaciones mediante el cual el pueblo, con su propia participación, esté habilitado para manifestarse por igual con puntos de vista tanto mayoritarios como minoritarios. Sin negar que todo sistema democrático eventualmente ha de descansar en decisiones mayoritarias, los mecanismos o instituciones de participación tienen el propósito de hacer hincapié en el pleno respeto a las minorías, sus opiniones y su amplia manifestación a través de un mecanismo participativo e institucionalizado

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might a letter-writing campaign get a company to change its business practices? A. The government wants to keep both consume
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer: C. The company might fear that the letter-writing campaign will become a boycott if it doesn't respond.

Explanation:

A letter-writing campaign might be a precursor to larger things such as a boycott and this is alone to ensure that companies pay attention to the concerns of those writing the letters.

The logic is simple. If the organizers of the people writing the letters could organize so many people to write letters, they could just as well organize these people to boycott the company if they do not get their way and this would be harmful to the business.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are types of geologists and three types of rock
    11·1 answer
  • Is the act of working in exchange for an income.
    13·2 answers
  • Why can young children run and jump well before they can follow the rules of games?
    11·1 answer
  • In face-to-face interactions, how is most information conveyed?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help I will reward brainly
    11·1 answer
  • 3. If one Canadian Dollar is worth 1.05 US dollars, you would receive ___ US dollars if you traded 100 Canadian dollars.
    5·2 answers
  • The nation formed by the southern states when they seceded from the United States.Immersive Reader
    15·1 answer
  • If you were George Washington, how would you feel when you saw the corporal refuse to help his men?
    5·2 answers
  • The mentally ill will recover more quickly by living in the real world and learning to survive on their own. The mentally ill sh
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these will most likely happen if the plateau pikas are completely removed from the tibetan plateau grasslands?.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!