Answer:
A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.
Explanation:
The given scenario presents a picture of the political situation of the state. It has been pointed that Senator Smith has not shown any remarkable progress in his tenure. The common citizens' demands and calls ave not been received by him in a responsible manner. Also, he has been active in the office for the last ten years. Hence, it can be predicted that any other candidate standing in opposition to the ruling party may win the election.
Contribution of Chinese in pie
Answer:
Indian removal was a forced migration in the 19th century whereby Native Americans were forced by the United States government to leave their ancestral homelands in the eastern United States to lands west of the Mississippi River, specifically to a designated Indian Territory (roughly, modern Oklahoma).
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! XDDDDDDDDDD
Answer:
Supporters of Laissez faire believe that this type of system promotes more incentives to trade and economic growth, in addition to encouraging freedom among companies.
Supporters of economic intervention, on the other hand, believe that the intervention promotes fairer and more equitable trade and allows new companies to become as influential as old companies, which will promote economic growth.
Explanation:
Economic intervention allows the government of a country to impose limits and interference in trade and the productive sector. These limitations prevent economically strong companies from dominating an entire productive sector, promoting more commercial fairness and allowing new companies to emerge in addition to allowing small companies to grow in the same sector as large companies.
Laissez Faire, on the other hand, discredits any government intervention in trade and this imposes freedom on companies and industries, which will allow full production and vast economic growth.
