Answer:
Hope it helps
Mark my answer brainliest
Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
If the government wishes to increase the level of real GDP, it might reduce <u>Taxes.</u>
This is due to the fact that if government reduces the transfer payment, size of budget deficit or its purchases of goods and services then as a result the level of real GDP deceases because of lower aggregate demand for the product.
Now, if government reduces the taxes, this will increase the individual's disposable income. So, this will results in higher aggregate demand and hence, increases the level of real GDP.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The business decision based on the company where you work would be this. To open a new small branch of the fast-food restaurant as a concession in the municipal stadium.
The incremental cost is the future costs as a result of this business decision. This means that we have to consider extra money on a monthly basis to pay for the rent of the concession booth at the Municipal stadium.
The opportunity cost is that instead of opening our branch in the new downtown mall, we decided to move with the stadium option. Having decided to be at the mall could have allowed us to have more clients on a daily basis, especially on weekends.
The sunk cost is a cost from the past, an historical cost that really is not important in the present time to make a decision. Maybe, just a reference to a case in the past. And that's it.
Here we can refer to a cost when we opened the first location of the restaurant, but it was five years ago. Those were different situations, necessities, and conditions.
Answer:
$1 par value
Explanation:
The computation of the par value of the stock after the split is given below:
= $200,000 ÷ (100,000 × 2 )
= $200,000 ÷ 200,000
= $1 par value
Hence, the par value of its stock after the split is $1 par value
We simply divide the balance by the number of outsanding shares so that the par value could come
Answer:
$75,240
Explanation:
Given that,
Consumer price index in 1999 = 170
Salary in 1999 = $44,000
Consumer price index in 2016 = 290
Therefore, the required salary is calculated as follows:
= Salary in 1999 × (Consumer price index in 2016 ÷ Consumer price index in 1999)
= $44,000 × (290 ÷ 170)
= $44,000 × 1.71
= $75,240
Hence, the amount of salary have to earn in 2016 in order to equal your 1999 real income is $75,240.
