The correct answer is this - <span>this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting.
If the conditions were a little bit different, then his IRB review would also require different results. However, since there is no real interaction with the children, but rather only observation, an IRB review is not necessary in this case and can be avoided.
</span>
1. Eating an apple
2.All of the listed answers have distinct structures and sets of functions
Answer:
the just-world hypothesis
Explanation:
When misfortunes befall a person, others sometimes think the victim of circumstances deserved what happened. One reason put forth to explain why someone would think like that has been called <u>the just-world hypothesis</u>.
The just-world hypothesis is the idea that people need to believe one will get what one deserves so strongly that they will rationalize an inexplicable injustice by naming things the victim might have done to deserve it.
Answer:
Not Acceptable
Explanation:
According to the code of Ethical Standard of American Psychological Association which applies to the clinical psychological researchers; it clearly mentioned that the researchers should not coerce the participants. Researchers cannot offer excessive or inappropriate financial or other awards as mentioned in code of ethical standards.
