Answer:
usyfusegvkjdfgvuasdgivhdsguivsduigvudsgvudsgvudsgfoshcvjsdgvu8sdghkv,bmxchvgs89eyfsgdyufvuerifiasgjvusdgfiuasgfjksdgfudsof
Explanation:
At the time, the government was considered to be democratic, the only federalist officers were the judges. In marbury v Madison the judge, was a federalist (Judge Marshall). What happened was Jefferson order the Secretary of state to not deliver commissions to federalist judges. Marybury sued for commissions, which created the case. What was significant was Marshall used the judiciary act to rule Marbury had commission, but it gave the court grater power than the constitution make the act unconstitutional. Marbury lost the case but the federalist judges won in the end. This case created Judicial review which let the supreme court exercise the power to decide weather an act of congress was allowed by the constitution. This gave the judges more power
Answer:
Explanation:
If you are referring to the Reconstruction Acts passed by Congress after the American Civil War, then no. For the most part the Reconstruction Acts protected the freedom of African-Americans. The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 and 1868 defined how the Southern States would be readmitted to the Union. The bills were written by the Radical Republicans. Radical Republicans were committed to enfranchisement and equal rights for freedmen. The rebel states were divided into five military districts. The states had to write new constitutions that protect the freedmen's right to vote. Each state had to ratify the 14th Amendment.
