1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dsp73
3 years ago
8

What has happened to Arab leaders like Anwar Sadat who have tried to make peace with Israel and to Israeli leaders like Yitzhak

Rabin who have tried to make peace with Palestinians? What do their fates tell you about the passion and anger found on both sides of this conflict?
History
1 answer:
Tatiana [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Both Anwar Sadat and Yitzhak Rabin were killed.

Explanation:

Sadat was Egypt 's military hero and served the country as President for 11 years. Yitzhak Rabin served two terms as Prime Minister of Israel. Both leaders have played a crucial role in shaping the development and achieving the modern status of their nation in the world.

Both leaders got Noble prize for peace negotiations. They saw peace efforts as a way of preventing more fatalities in their respective countries and giving them stability. However, both were killed by the people who belied peace as a symbol of cowardliness.

You might be interested in
how was trade between Europe and Asia before the 1400s different from trade between the 1400s and 1700s?
mariarad [96]

East Asia was known for gold, jewels, and spices. that is Correct MarleneNorals.


5 0
3 years ago
A somewhat controversial amendment which is often referred to in National Rifle Association publications, would be the
Aneli [31]
It would be the second amendment,
7 0
3 years ago
Who was marie curie?
Tanya [424]

Marie Curie was a physicist and chemist and a pioneer in the study of radiation. She and her husband, Pierre, discovered the elements polonium and radium. Together, they were awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1903, and she received another one, for Chemistry, in 1911.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The people who fled the dust bowl were referred to as what
jasenka [17]

your answer is "Okie"

<em>explanation:</em>

dust bowl refugees are called an "Okie"

5 0
3 years ago
Why was Washington against the formation of political parties and participation in political parties?
Advocard [28]

George Washington was against the formation of and participation in political parties because he truly believed in Unity.

From his perspective Unity, and not Division, was the key for a democratic republic to survive. He really thought that political parties would have negative effects because they would divide and destroy the United States.  

And that's the main reason why throughout his political life until his death, he was sure political parties were not needed because the country could and should function without them.  

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the public lose trust in the federal government
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following conditions enable Julius Caesar's rise to power and the republics transition to an empire
    14·2 answers
  • Who was emmet till and why was he killed?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT a nonviolent protest campaign of Gandhi's? A. noncooperation movement B. the Salt March C. the Ro
    12·1 answer
  • What happened to germany after they invaded the soviet union
    11·2 answers
  • Which of these ancient documents recorded a set of laws for a society? A. The Epic of Gilgamesh B. The Sumerian King List C. The
    10·2 answers
  • Analyze the document "King Andrew the First (c. 1833)" by explaining its "HIPP" (historical context, intended audience, author's
    5·2 answers
  • 2.
    7·2 answers
  • Can someone give me some examples on why hunter gather is better then todays society
    15·1 answer
  • How were Spartan and Athenian government different?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!