Answer:
If it was my first flight I would literally be nervous and excited too. On the day before the travel to space, while I'm sleeping I would imagine all the planets or what all will I see and I will imagine of shoting pictures.I would prepare by keeping all the stuff I needed and keeping myself practised and ready.
The statement which tells the central idea of the poem is Being nobody is not a lonely position to hold, and despite being despised, it has its benefits.
<h3>What is, "I'm nobody! Who are you"?</h3>
I'm nobody! Who are you? is a poem written by Emily Dickinson. The poem is about being anonymous is good, in place of being somebody, being nobody is advantageous.
The options are attached here:
A. Being nobody is a lonely identity that is looked down upon and has no advantages.
B. Being nobody is a lonely identity that is looked down upon, but it has many advantages.
C. Being nobody is not a lonely identity, and though it may be looked down upon, it has its advantages.
Thus, the correct option is C. Being nobody is not a lonely position to hold, and despite being despised, it has its benefits.
Learn more about "I'm nobody! Who are you"
brainly.com/question/27513663
#SPJ1
Answer:
here is one example The PSA is a theory of change, meant to locate a programme, project, or campaign within a wider analysis of how change comes about. There are two ways to use it: by looking backwards, in order to explore past stories of change; and by looking forward, by learning to ‘expect the unexpected’. The PSA suggests characteristics that activists should cultivate in order to flourish in complex systems, like curiosity, humility, self-awareness, and openness to a diversity of viewpoints.
Explanation:
over time veiw points change
Question 1 (Worth 5 points)
[MC]
The Pony Express
Chapter I
At A Nation's Crisis
The fall of Fort Sumter in April, 1861, did not produce the Civil War crisis. For many months, the gigantic struggle then imminent had been painfully discernible to far-seeing men. In 1858, Lincoln had forewarned the country in his "House Divided" speech. As early as the beginning of the year 1860 the Union had been plainly in jeopardy. Early in February of that momentous year, Jefferson Davis, on behalf of the South, had introduced his famous resolutions in the Senate of the United States. This document was the ultimatum of the dissatisfied slave-holding commonwealths. It demanded that Congress should protect slavery throughout the domain of the United States. The territories, it declared, were the common property of the states of the Union and hence open to the citizens of all states with all their personal possessions. The Northern states, furthermore, were no longer to interfere with the working of the Fugitive Slave Act. They must repeal their Personal Liberty laws and respect the Dred Scott Decision of the Federal Supreme Court. Neither in their own legislatures nor in Congress should they trespass upon the right of the South to regulate slavery as it best saw fit.
These resolutions, demanding in effect that slavery be thus safeguarded—almost to the extent of introducing it into the free states—really foreshadowed the Democratic platform of 1860 which led to the great split in that party, the victory of the Republicans under Lincoln, the subsequent secession of the more radical southern states, and finally the Civil War, for it was inevitable that the North, when once aroused, would bitterly resent such pro-slavery demands.
And this great crisis was only the bursting into flame of many smaller fires that had long been smoldering. For generations the two sections had been drifting apart. Since the middle of the seventeenth century, Mason and Dixon's line had been a line of real division separating two inherently distinct portions of the country.
Reread these lines from the Chapter 1 excerpt and answer the question that follows:
These resolutions, demanding in effect that slavery be thus safeguarded—almost to the extent of introducing it into the free states—really foreshadowed the Democratic platform of 1860 which led to the great split in that party, the victory of the Republicans under Lincoln, the subsequent secession of the more radical southern states, and finally the Civil War, for it was inevitable that the North, when once aroused, would bitterly resent such pro-slavery demands.
Which of the following best summarizes the message of these lines?
The radical southern states instigated the Civil War.
The North expected and demanded Civil War.
Differing opinions on slavery contributed to the Civil War.
Disputes between political parties had little effect on the Civil War.
Points earned on this question: 0
<span>
</span>
