Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
It would be Austria-Hungary’s imperialist ambitions to dominate the Balkans, as they couldn’t possibly stay a united country as there was many different languages and cultures which led to struggles for independence which led to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian terrorist organization
The correct answer is either A. OR D.
I would have to go with Completion of the transcontinental railroad in 1869
