The evidence the author uses to support the false analogy is that college sports are just as important as bookstores.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The author uses a false relationship between university games and university bookstores.
- He uses this to show that students who work in bookstores receive salaries, but university players don't, but they are of equal importance.
- The evidence that the author shows to confirm this relationship is that college games are as important as bookstores.
- However, both the relationship and the evidence convey an incorrect idea.
Bookstores are part of the educational system that universities should promote, university games are not. In addition, many college athletes have scholarships, while students working in the campus do so for salaries or lower funding.
You can find more information about false analogy at the link:
brainly.com/question/1235960
DETAILS is the only thing not to highlet alright i just took the test hope this helps you.
Answer:
an imaginry person that inhabits a literary work. literary characters may be major or minor static or dynamic in shakespeare othello esdemona is a major character but one who is static like the moinor character bianca othello is a major character who is dynamic exhibiting an ability to change
Answer: B) Indirect Characterization
Explanation: Indirect characterization is the process by which the writer shows the character's personality through speech, actions and appearance. When you watch a movie or television show, you can usually gather what type of person the main character is based on the character's actions and reactions in different situations.
It is thanks to his jealousy that the Frog becomes the sole singer at the end of the poem.
He envied the Nightingale's talent and therefore tricked the Nightingale into practicing so much it died. After the Nightingale's death, the Frog became the only (and therefore best) singer. The Frog's success was only possible due to his jealousy. If he had not been jealous of the Nightingale, the Frog would not have become the singer he became.
