Answer:
Answers B and C are correct (the middle two)
Explanation:
It <u><em>did </em></u>accelerate the growth of new territories, and it <u><em>was </em></u>financed by the government.
Hope this helps :)
(Brainliest?)
Both have the right to own property, bear arms, and freedom of religion
Answer:
Wear goggles
wash your hands
follow directions
don't fool around
Explanation:
Someone keeps deleting my answer to this!
Answer:
The sampling technique used in this case is a probability sampling because the researcher selects a random members of a population by setting a few selection criteria, in this case, people who have adopted children from outside the United States. These selection "rules" or parameters allow every member to have the equal opportunities to be a part of various samples as it seems to be the objective of the researcher because he asked them to exchange their contact information.
LexisNexis search, and you’ll find that “Trump” and some variant of “impeach” have already appeared in 37 newspaper headlines. (Duplicates are at play, yes, but let’s not get in the way of a striking statistic.) Documentarian Michael Moore has vowed to look for the first impeachment opportunity and do what he can to help spur it along. Law professor Christopher Lewis Peterson of the University of Utah has written a paper arguing that Donald Trump can technically be impeached immediately, provided that Trump University is judged to be as fraudulent as it looks. Allan Lichtman, the American University professor who predicted Trump’s win, also predicted Trump would be impeached. Clearly, no one’s wasting time on this. So what are we to make of it?