I assume that the question refers to Edgar Allan Poe - the American writer, critic and editor.
- he went to the University of Virginia. However, he did not graduate and he left the college after one semester due to the lack of money. After this, he enlisted in the Army.
Explanation:
it has become less restricted over time.
Answer:
His name is Julius Caesar.
Explanation:
Julius Caesar is seen as one of the greatest generals in the history of human kind. He participated in many war campaigns, and the one mentioned in here against Gaul was described in one of his books.
On the other side, he formed alliance with Pompey, but later they became enemies, and Caesar defeated him.
Among those who killed was his close friend Brutus.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
e. Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive research, inductive method, inductive reasoning or simply induction, is a type of research or argument used in various areas of knowledge. This method is intended to reach a conclusion. As such, it is widely used in the sciences in which it starts from true premises to arrive at conclusions that may or may not be true. In this sense, the induction adds new information to the assumptions that were previously given.
An example of inductive research is Erickson's research, shown in the above question, where he took true information (through interviews with residents) to come to a true conclusion that the damage to social ties in the community caused by the flood was so destructive. regarding physical damage to the community.
