Answer:
Their land & production of goods.
Explanation:
They produced goods and the land helped wit it
Hoped this helped
Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
Answer:
Jefferson’s goals of peaceful relations.
Explanation:
The Embargo Act and the Louisiana Purchase promote Jefferson’s goals of peaceful relations with Britain and land gained from the France by giving money for that. He wanted to get economic growth by maintaining good relations with the European countries. for that purpose he passed the Embargo Act and the Louisiana Purchase was done to acquire land from France.
Answer:
natural rights are guaranteed to all people. regardless to their place in.
